Mixed Insurance Banners Health Insurance for Visitors to USA

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Entry to US subsequent to losing GC

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Entry to US subsequent to losing GC

    Apologize if this has been posted before .

    What I wanted to know was, suppose a person has lost his/her PR status [by being out of the country too long , for example] . Is it possible for that person to enter the US at a later date on another visa ? say H1 , L1 or B1 ? Will the fact that the person gave up PR status in the past affect his/her getting these type of visas?

    Further to this , if the person enters on H1 or L1 , can the employer sponsor the person for PR status again?

    Any information on this would be very helpful and appreciated

    Thanks

  • #2
    Re: Entry to US subsequent to losing GC

    Getting a non-immigrant visa (other than H1 or L1) requires that a person does not have immigration intent. Giving up the GC actually is a good indicator for that. But of course, it alone is not enough. Ties to the home country, like a job there, are also required.
    Other than that, there is nothing that prevents a former Permanent Resident to get a non-immigrant visa.
    And of course, a former Permanent Resident can be sponsored for a GC again.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks JoeF, for your quick and helpful response [as always] . Let me understand - you are basically saying that for such a person, getting a B1 or tourist visa *could* be a problem - however getting a H1 or L1 should not be at all - is that right ?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Entry to US subsequent to losing GC

        Correct. H1 and L1 allow immigration intent, all other non-immigrant visas do not.
        The problem for a tourist visa or any non-immigrant visa other than H1 and L1 (e.g., student visa) is to convince the consular officer that there is no immigration intent.
        The consular officers have a lot of discretion to decide if the evidence provided is good enough.
        Having given up a GC is one piece of the evidence, nothing more. In such a situation, I would argue that there used to be immigration intent, but not anymore, hence giving up the GC. I have no idea, though, if they would see it this way as well. This fact alone is probably not enough, but it could be a supporting factor.
        For H1 and L1, this whole consideration is irrelevant.

        Comment

        {{modal[0].title}}

        X

        {{modal[0].content}}

        {{promo.content}}

        Working...
        X